- Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:00 am
#25657
Setup and Rule Diagram Explanation
This is a Grouping: Balanced, Partially-Defined game.
The game scenario establishes that five kinds of materials are recycled at three recycling centers,
with each center recycling at least two, but no more than three, kinds of materials:
Each kind of material will be recycled in at least one center, making this game Balanced. Notice,
however, that each variable can repeat as many as three times, because the same material can be
recycled at more than one of the centers. The size of each group, is equally unclear, because each
center can recycle as few as two, and as many as three, kinds of material. Thus, the game is
Partially-Defined.
At this point, many test takers would probably wonder if it’s worth examining the Numerical
Distributions that govern the assignment of the five materials to each of the three centers.
Unfortunately, the 5-into-3 distribution is fairly open-ended, because we know neither the total
number of variables to be distributed, nor the precise number of available spaces in each group. A
numerical analysis would therefore be counterproductive.
The first rule states that any center that recycles wood also recycles newsprint:
You should immediately notice that the contrapositive leaves only three kinds of material to be
recycled by any center that does not recycle N:
The second rule stipulates that every kind of material that Center 2 recycles is also recycled at
Center 1. It is best to represent this rule internally, as shown below:
You should closely examine the implications of this rule, and make at least some of the following
inferences:
center does not recycle glass. We get two rules for the price of one here, so it is best to consider
them individually:
The fact that only one of the centers recycles plastic means we can only have one P in our setup,
which is something we can notate using a subscript as shown below:
is also recycled at Center 1, we can conclude that Center 2 cannot recycle plastic, an inference
that is tested directly in Question #19. Consequently, the center that recycles plastic must be
either Center 1 or 3:
The second part of the third rule prohibits plastic and glass from being recycled in the same
center, a prohibition we can represent using either a vertical Not Block or a Double-Not arrow, as
shown below:
With all the rules diagrammed and some inferences already made, let’s consider the game from a
purely grouping perspective, that is, a perspective that does not dwell on the distinctions between
Centers 1, 2, and 3. Although the three groups are not functionally identical (the second rule
ensures that Centers 1 and 2 are two functionally different groups), ultimately our task will
always be to select either two or three variables out of the available five. The first and the third
rules will be key in this selection process. Here’s why:
As discussed earlier, thanks to the contrapositive of the first rule, if a center does not recycle N,
then it cannot recycle W. Such a center is left with only three kinds of material – P, T, and G –
two of which – P and G – cannot be recycled in the same center (third rule). Thus, if a center does
not recycle N, then it must recycle T, along with either P or G (but not both):
Several additional inferences can be made:
This is a Grouping: Balanced, Partially-Defined game.
The game scenario establishes that five kinds of materials are recycled at three recycling centers,
with each center recycling at least two, but no more than three, kinds of materials:
Each kind of material will be recycled in at least one center, making this game Balanced. Notice,
however, that each variable can repeat as many as three times, because the same material can be
recycled at more than one of the centers. The size of each group, is equally unclear, because each
center can recycle as few as two, and as many as three, kinds of material. Thus, the game is
Partially-Defined.
At this point, many test takers would probably wonder if it’s worth examining the Numerical
Distributions that govern the assignment of the five materials to each of the three centers.
Unfortunately, the 5-into-3 distribution is fairly open-ended, because we know neither the total
number of variables to be distributed, nor the precise number of available spaces in each group. A
numerical analysis would therefore be counterproductive.
The first rule states that any center that recycles wood also recycles newsprint:
You should immediately notice that the contrapositive leaves only three kinds of material to be
recycled by any center that does not recycle N:
The second rule stipulates that every kind of material that Center 2 recycles is also recycled at
Center 1. It is best to represent this rule internally, as shown below:
You should closely examine the implications of this rule, and make at least some of the following
inferences:
- 1. If Center 1 does not recycle a given material, then Center 2 cannot recycle that
material either. Consequently, the material must be recycled at Center 3. And,
by the contrapositive, if a given material is not recycled at Center 3, then it
must be recycled at Center 1:
- 2. Center 1 must recycle at least as many kinds of material as Center 2:
- Center 1 ≥ Center 2
- 3. If Center 2 recycles three kinds of material, then Centers 1 and 2 will recycle
exactly the same kinds of material as each other, because Center 1 cannot
recycle more than three kinds of material.
center does not recycle glass. We get two rules for the price of one here, so it is best to consider
them individually:
The fact that only one of the centers recycles plastic means we can only have one P in our setup,
which is something we can notate using a subscript as shown below:
- G N P1 T W5
is also recycled at Center 1, we can conclude that Center 2 cannot recycle plastic, an inference
that is tested directly in Question #19. Consequently, the center that recycles plastic must be
either Center 1 or 3:
The second part of the third rule prohibits plastic and glass from being recycled in the same
center, a prohibition we can represent using either a vertical Not Block or a Double-Not arrow, as
shown below:
With all the rules diagrammed and some inferences already made, let’s consider the game from a
purely grouping perspective, that is, a perspective that does not dwell on the distinctions between
Centers 1, 2, and 3. Although the three groups are not functionally identical (the second rule
ensures that Centers 1 and 2 are two functionally different groups), ultimately our task will
always be to select either two or three variables out of the available five. The first and the third
rules will be key in this selection process. Here’s why:
As discussed earlier, thanks to the contrapositive of the first rule, if a center does not recycle N,
then it cannot recycle W. Such a center is left with only three kinds of material – P, T, and G –
two of which – P and G – cannot be recycled in the same center (third rule). Thus, if a center does
not recycle N, then it must recycle T, along with either P or G (but not both):
Several additional inferences can be made:
- 1. From the contrapositive of the inference made above, if a center recycles not two but
three kinds of materials, then it would be impossible for that center not to recycle N.
So, N must be recycled at any center that recycles three kinds of materials:
- 3 materials N
- 2. If a center does not recycle N, then it must recycle T, and vice versa: if it does not
recycle T, then it must recycle N. Clearly, then, each center must recycle neither N or
T (or both), an inference we can plug into our main diagram:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.