- Posts: 31
- Joined: Jan 10, 2022
- Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:30 am
#99976
The problem with (B) is that (B) is a valid argument. Imagine the baseline measurement is 100 shoppers, and during the advertising campaign only summer has seen an increase in shoppers by 5 to now 105. All the other seasons remain 100 or even lower. So of course we can say that the campaign AFFECTED only the summer shoppers.
Note that in the passage the author is criticizing the view that the lighted up parts after the subtraction represent the only parts involved in a certain cognitive task. That is different from (B). (B) is not saying that only summer has shoppers, but the campaign only affected summer shoppers. It merely states exactly what's happening. So it's a valid argument. It's like if the author says that only those lighted up parts are affected by the cognitive task, that would also be a valid argument, as we know that all the other brain parts are still working, however as they are working just like every other day, on a calm, ordinary level still under baseline measurement, so it's safe to say that those parts are not AFFECTED by the cognitive task.
Note that in the passage the author is criticizing the view that the lighted up parts after the subtraction represent the only parts involved in a certain cognitive task. That is different from (B). (B) is not saying that only summer has shoppers, but the campaign only affected summer shoppers. It merely states exactly what's happening. So it's a valid argument. It's like if the author says that only those lighted up parts are affected by the cognitive task, that would also be a valid argument, as we know that all the other brain parts are still working, however as they are working just like every other day, on a calm, ordinary level still under baseline measurement, so it's safe to say that those parts are not AFFECTED by the cognitive task.