- Wed Oct 18, 2017 11:23 am
#40662
Hi.
as Dave and many of staff knows, I developed a habit of analyzing any speeches I hear into LSAT terms these days because I am so into do well in LSAT. anyways, I studied politics as undergraduate; I have a habit of listening to prior public office figures' speeches time to time.
In this video clip:
President Bill Clinton : To be fair for president George , some of it(budget defecit) was gonna happen due to 9/11 and need to go to Afghanistan
2:55-03:00 , https://vimeo.com/44744329
ever since I heard this statement, I felt conditional relationship can be made. Originally, I was not going to ask cuz I do not want my bad habit of thinking everything in LSAT terms ; asking whether I am thinking correctly , then bothering other people due to my excessive thinking. which Dave kindly referred that I am overdoing it and got me in troubles prior. But it has been rining in my brain in longest time and driving me crazy; so I musk ask. (Sorry)
is it correct to analyze as which of the following manner
1. Fair ----> president George.
or
2. Fairpresident George some of it(budget deficit) was gonna happen due to 9/11 and need to go to Afghanistan
or
3. The conditional nature in this relationship is not that strong anyways that it is not worth bothering to create a conditional relationship in actual LSAT if I see such a statement .
as Dave and many of staff knows, I developed a habit of analyzing any speeches I hear into LSAT terms these days because I am so into do well in LSAT. anyways, I studied politics as undergraduate; I have a habit of listening to prior public office figures' speeches time to time.
In this video clip:
President Bill Clinton : To be fair for president George , some of it(budget defecit) was gonna happen due to 9/11 and need to go to Afghanistan
2:55-03:00 , https://vimeo.com/44744329
ever since I heard this statement, I felt conditional relationship can be made. Originally, I was not going to ask cuz I do not want my bad habit of thinking everything in LSAT terms ; asking whether I am thinking correctly , then bothering other people due to my excessive thinking. which Dave kindly referred that I am overdoing it and got me in troubles prior. But it has been rining in my brain in longest time and driving me crazy; so I musk ask. (Sorry)
is it correct to analyze as which of the following manner
1. Fair ----> president George.
or
2. Fairpresident George some of it(budget deficit) was gonna happen due to 9/11 and need to go to Afghanistan
or
3. The conditional nature in this relationship is not that strong anyways that it is not worth bothering to create a conditional relationship in actual LSAT if I see such a statement .