- Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:48 am
#62901
Hi oli_oops!
The specifics of the next-door neighbor's rugrat were a bit unexpected for sure, but it was just the idea that there was any person in the neighborhood under six that would have an impact on the pool's potential morning hours.
Though answer choice D uses the word some which is often a very attractive factor in a MBT answer, there is a pretty big conceptual shift that kicks D off of the potential winner list. The stimulus talked only of the schedule for accessibility to the pool, but we have no idea if anyone ever actually does swim. Being permitted to do something isn't equivalent to necessarily doing that thing.
Maybe the pool has been contaminated with toxic waste and no one wants to even dip their toes in the green sludge? Or perhaps the afternoon is when the pool employees release chlorine-tolerant killer sharks to swim their laps and its best to stay out of the water for a few hours... Obviously exaggerated examples, but it hopefully helps to show the difference between being permitted to swim and actually swimming.
We also know that children under six aren't permitted to swim between noon and 5pm, which I would have to think covers the whole range of the afternoon. That means this answer is also dubious in that it limits any potential children swimmers to those between six and whatever is decided as the highest range for childhood.
In summary: it's good to lean into answers with weak logical force (some, may, could, might, possible, etc), but we have to be extremely careful to watch for equivocations between concepts that make even weak statements unable to be proven true.
I hope that helps!